A lot has happened

Posted November 12th, 2008 at 12:56 AM in Journalism, Politics, Technology

This blog, which I had vowed to maintain, fell asleep as work got busy, and it stayed asleep as the election heated up.

Bad timing, I know.

Sen. Barack Obama defeated Sen. John McCain in the 2008 presidential race a week ago. It was truly moving to watch, even for a cynic like me. It seems like only yesterday that I had actually seen Obama so much in person — in high school multipurpose rooms and at moderately priced hotel conference centers — that I was tired of him. Now he is the President-elect.

Change is coming to the country, and it is coming to this blog. My specified mission here — to examine and document intersections between politics, journalism, and technology — remains unchanged, but I plan to pay more attention to the technology piece. I will try to offer some practical advice based on my experience retooling and subsequently maintaining several high-traffic news sites for the day job.

I promise not to abandon politics, which is still my favorite thing to talk about in real life, but frankly, there is less politics to talk about these days.

Here’s to better days. I promise, if you subscribe to my RSS feed now, you won’t regret it.

No comments yet  

Judging other magazines by their covers

Posted July 15th, 2008 at 2:12 PM in Journalism, Politics

The cover art accompanying Ryan Lizza’s New Yorker profile of Barack Obama’s political ascension has provoked a frenzy of media self-flagellation.

It’s clear that the cover is satire, and should any conservatives attempt to cite it as factual rather than ironic, the joke will be on them. There are a lot of Americans who believe Obama is a Muslim, and there are a lot of Americans who believe that Michelle Obama is a radicalized, angry Black woman.

But those who buy into that false narrative aren’t reading the New Yorker, and it’s obvious mockery like the cover below that will help put an end to it, as long as enough people see it in the proper context. Over the past three days, I think everyone has heard about it in the right context.

I actually think it’s the subtler magazine covers that present the most danger for misinterpretation. This week’s Newsweek cover (above, left) asks what it thinks is a reasonable question, but it leaves the answer to the inside pages that the vast majority of Americans will never see.

It’s not the answer to the question of “What does Barack Obama believe?” that will drive false narratives about the Illinois senator’s religion and patriotism, it’s the constant, open-ended questioning of it that is most dangerous.

The New Yorker mocks those who question Obama’s patriotism and values, while Newsweek reinforces the question’s relevance. Which do you think is worse?

No comments yet  

McCain campaign still not vetting names on press releases

Posted July 9th, 2008 at 12:51 PM in Journalism, Politics

John McCain’s presidential campaign has been embarassed several times for associating itself — ususally in tangential ways — with individuals who end up, in one way or another, embarassing the Arizona senator. Usually it’s something petty, like an anti-semitic pastor, a former lobbyist for state sponsors of terrorism, etc.

This week, it’s 300 economists, whom McCain got to sign on to his economic plan. But to get the signatures, he had to leave some of the more politically important pieces of his plan out. And it turns out not all of the signatories are even supporters of his. Politico got the story:

The endorsement could hardly have been stronger. On Monday, John McCain’s campaign released a statement signed by 300 economists who “enthusiastically support” his “Jobs for America” economic plan, providing a heavyweight testimonial to the presumptive Republican nominee’s “broad and powerful economic agenda.”

There’s just one problem. Upon closer inspection, it seems a good many of those economists don’t actually support the whole of McCain’s economic agenda. And at least one doesn’t even support McCain for president.

Read the rest here.

No comments yet  

Dept. of 2004 campaign hindsight

Posted July 8th, 2008 at 11:43 AM in Journalism, Politics

In Time’s Swampland blog, we’re reminded of a GOP argument about small business taxes that President George W. Bush used in 2004: that John Kerry wanted to raise taxes on small businesses, which employ an astoundingly high percentage of the American workforce. It took Jay Newton-Small one paragraph to debunk the argument:

Bush loved to cite on the stump the plight of the 4.1 million “subchapter S” companies – another catagory of small businesses that have less than 100 shareholders and pay individual income taxes. As my former Bloomberg colleague Ryan Donmoyer — the best tax reporter in town — pointed out, the argument was a bit ridiculous because less than 5% of small businesses who file under sub-chapter S made more than $200,000, Kerry’s threshold in 2004.

I know folks who voted for Bush over Kerry because of this argument. Those voters likely didn’t know that Kerry’s proposal would only affect the 5% of “subchapter S” companies making more than $200,000 per year.

Is that the Kerry campaign’s fault, for not defending its plan to raise taxes and communicating the details more effectively? No. Read the rest of this entry »

No comments yet  

Email Fundraising 1, Direct Mail 0

Posted July 8th, 2008 at 2:13 AM in Journalism, Politics, Technology

Talking Points Memo may have singlehandedly taken down GOP direct mail fundraising firm BMW Direct for charging ridiculous fees (perhaps selectively) and — worse — for deceiving clients. The way TPM has reported the story will be a textbook study in online journalism going forward, because their execution — timing, reaction, writing style, etc. — have been pitch perfect.

And no, a direct mail firm isn’t on the same level as Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, but that became too big a story to credit one online news outlet with everything. The BMW Direct story is all TPM’s.

My reaction to the allegations? I’m not shocked.

Perhaps to those who are used to watching politics on a national stage, who haven’t gotten their hands dirty in races that don’t get the media spotlight, consultants ripping off candidates is a new phenomenon. But away from all the attention, it happens all the time.

Uninitiated candidates who try to navigate the terrain of a campaign alone are unbelievably easy marks.

Among other lessons campaigns can learn from the story is this: the more a campaign can use the Internet to cut out vendors and consultants, the better. Email fundraising will put companies like BMW Direct out of business, or it will at least prevent them from inflating production and delivery costs, since those are effectively zero online.

No comments yet  

Coming soon

Posted July 5th, 2008 at 5:41 AM in Journalism, Politics, Technology

Sorry for the delay. For more about me, go here.

No comments yet